About Me

Name: Boomer911
Location: Chicago, IL
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Great Information!!
  • The Patriot Post">Patriot Post

De-Valued President of A De-Valued Government

I happened across a great video today of a European Parliament session in which Britain's Prime Minister Gordon Brown gets raked over the coals by a gentleman from Southeast England named Daniel Hannan. Hannan is the MEP for that region and I could not help but smile as I watched him berate the Prime Minister and wondered if anyone in this nation had the courage to say this to Obama, Reid, or Pelosi. Mr. Hannan is right on point and in fact all one would have to do is change a few words and this wonderful and articulate rant could be delivered to president Obama and not lose any of the sizzle. My favorite part is the "de-valued Prime Minister of a de-valued government" and I have already taken the liberty of changing "Prime Minister" to president. Check this out:
 
                                                                  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Question Of The Night.....

If there was one question from last night's presidential press conference that I simply delighted in, it was the question asked by CNN's Ed Henry concerning the president's "outrage" over the AIG mess and why it took so long. But what Henry also did was call out the president by drawing in on the fact that Obama and his minions keep driving home this "we inheritted it" mantra all the while running up deficits that will surely be passed on to the next president. When asked about the inherent hypocrosy of the argument, Obama looks and sounds as if he was truly stumped. Kudos to CNN's Ed Henry for asking the question of the night.
 
You can watch the exchange here:
                                                      
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Re-Defining Marriage..... Literally

Merriam-Webster has come up with a solution to the issue of gay marriage. In a move that would surely make many court justices throughout America smile like proud papa's, the people at Merriam-Webster have taken a page out of the judiciary's playbook and simply changed the meaning of the word marriage....literally. These self appointed culture czars have taken it upon themselves to help America see the error of its ways by more or less telling the American people they are wrong for supporting traditional defintions of marriage because marriage is no longer defined in such terms. Yes.....that is correct.......Merriam-Webster has re-written its defintion of marriage to include homosexual marriage. When anyone can arbitrarily change the meaning of words, traditions, or laws, to satisfy their view of the world, they no longer mean anything and are completely devoid of value. What if I wanted to change the meaning of the word "murder"? Wait....I've forgotten....liberals have already changed the definition. Ok...how about the word "person"? Damn it.....liberals have beat me to it again! My point is this; should I change the definition or more importantly......could I? Doesn't society have to at least agree with the new meaning of the word? The word "bad" comes to mind when a few generations ago, the word took on a new meaning for good. Example: "That 1967 Pontiac GTO is bad." Not only did the word come to represent good in a slang sense but it also retained its original meaning of "not good in any manner or degree". But see, that's what liberals do. They see the world in a certain way and if the rest of the world doesn't agree with that view, they set out to change it by doing what they do best, by distorting reality and re-writing history. Liberals have no use for truth, reason, and logic because those criteria lend themselves to showing liberals they are wrong. If they had any use for them, they wouldn't be liberals. It's funny how truth has a way of setting you free.
 
Watch this video and see what I am talking about.
                                                              
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Chicago Tea Party?

CNBC is by no means the place to go to get hard hitting, honest, and objective reporting but I have to tip my hat to CNBC's Rick Santelli who gets the Chicago trading floor riled up with some honest and loud objections to what is happening here in America. Give it a look. http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1039849853
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pelosi and The Pope

Well, it seems Nancy Pelosi has met with Pope Benedict XVI during her recent visit to Rome. Both Pelosi and Pope Benedict's press office have released statements concerning the visit and their stark contrast is almost laughable. Here are the two press releases:
 

From the office of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi:

It is with great joy that my husband, Paul, and I met with His Holiness, Pope Benedict XVI, today. In our conversation, I had the opportunity to praise the Church's leadership in fighting poverty, hunger, and global warming, as well as the Holy Father's dedication to religious freedom and his upcoming trip and message to Israel. I was proud to show His Holiness a photograph of my family's papal visit in the 1950s, as well as a recent picture of our children and grandchildren.

From the Press Office of the Holy See:

Following the General Audience, the Holy Father briefly greeted Mrs. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, together with her entourage. His Holiness took the opportunity to speak of the requirements of the natural moral law and the Church's consistent teaching on the dignity of human life from conception until natural death, which enjoin all Catholics, and especially legislators, jurists, and those responsible for the common good of society, to work in cooperation with all men and women of good will in creating a just system of laws capable of protecting human life at all stages of development.

Oh to be a fly on the wall of that room! I would have loved to see the look on Pelosi's face as the head of the Catholic Church more or less told her that her views concerning abortion were wrong and not in-line with Catholic teachings. Pelosi trumpets her ardent Catholicism and to be admonished by his Holiness must have been a sight to behold. It remains to be seen however, which will take precedent....her ardent feminist views on abortion or her faith in the Catholic church and its teachings? I know which one I am betting on.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Unified Leadership

If there has been one aspect of the economic downturn that I would deem as "good", it would be the re-emergence of conservativism in the Republican party. This "stimulus" bill is a sham and it has been the conservatives to step out in front to challenge the assertions of the democrats and also provide sound free market solutions but to no avail. The following video is a great example of David and Goliath politics (literally when you see the size difference) in our country today created by the democrat majorities in Congress and in the White House. Rep. Jim Jordan stands up to the liberal lie and tells it like it truly is. This is the loud, in your face, unified leadership we need. We cannot let the democrats frame this argument the way they did the housing issue, going so far as to turn the tables on Republicans and blame them for the economic problems when in fact it was the policies of the left in our politics that have created this mess. Watch and enjoy.
                                                  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Drops Charges On Terrorist

In what has to be one of the most infuriating stories thus far into the infancy of the Obama presidency, this one tops them all. According to the AP, the last active war crimes case against suspected al-Qaida bomber Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri ended when all of the charges were dropped in order to comply with Obama's executive order that all trials at Guantanamo be stopped. Al-Nashiri was a suspect in the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole that killed 17 U.S. Sailors and will remain in prison apparently awaiting whether or not the United States will charge him again with any further crimes.
 
This is a slap in the face to all those who serve, especially the 17 who gave their all on that fateful day in 2000. The implications of such a move by Obama will reach far beyond our shores and only embolden our enemies. He catered to the far left of the democrat party and now a terrorist sits awaiting his outcome. Will we nail this piece of human garbage if the evidence is available or will we let him walk? President Obama, this is in your hands.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obamacrats Plan for Debt

In what has so many shaking their heads and wondering just what is going in Washington D.C., the Heritage Foundation absolutely shreds the democrats stimulus bill and brings up a lot of issues concerning their plan. I have copied it below.
 

With countless news stories, papers, editorials and experts giving their view of why Congress should or shouldn’t enact the Pelosi-Reid-Obama Debt Plan, we thought it would be helpful to give you a short index of why spending does not equal stimulus.

HIGH COST TO AMERICAN TAXPAYERS

  • After Congress appropriates the FY’09 omnibus bill, they may have spent over $1.4 Trillion in less than one month!
    The current “stimulus bill” will be the LARGEST SPENDING BILL EVER enacted by Congress, making the New Deal look small, accounting for inflation.
  • The “Stimulus” Bills Your Family – $825 Billion is equivalent to borrowing $10,520 from EVERY FAMILY IN AMERICA. This money has to be paid back.
  • If all families were asked to equally shoulder the burden of $825 Billon, this debt would be equivalent to what they roughly spend on food, clothing, and health care in an entire year.
  • If Government Spending solved recessions, we would never have recessions.

BAD IDEAS – “THE DEVIL IN DISGUISE”
The hidden liberal policy agenda inside the ‘stimulus bill’…

  • Over $142 Billion in Federal education funds: Nearly double the total outlays for the Dept. of Education in 2007 – making good on Reid-Pelosi-Obama education promises to the NEA.
  • $87 Billion Medicaid bailout: Medicaid is funded by a formula that matches state spending levels with federal dollars. If we keep bailing states out, they will have every incentive to continue irresponsible spending. Fiscally responsible taxpayers in Indiana are now paying for fiscally irresponsible bureaucrats in Illinois.
  • Expanded Medicaid coverage and SCHIP: Reid-Pelosi-Obama are enacting a nationalized health care policy with no debate. The government will soon be responsible for more health care spending than the private sector, i.e. socialized medicine.
  • Green Jobs?: The myth of ‘green jobs’ merely means replacing one job lost, with a new job that fits the left’s agenda. It is a zero sum game. More than doubling spending, the stimulus also has over $35 billion for the Dept. of Energy. DOE’s current budget is $23.8 billion.
  • Family Planning and birth control for children, immigrants and the wealthy, which could also be used as a backdoor to allow federal funding of abortions. How is this stimulus?  **UPDATE: Nancy Pelosi agrees this is not stimulus and has removed it from the bill proving these measures are allergic to sunshine.**
  • Redistribution: Refundable Tax Credits for people who don’t pay taxes.
  • Pork Spending: Digital TV Coupons ($650 Million), Gov’t Cars ($600 Million), Nat’l Endowment for the Arts ($50 Million), Repairs to National Mall ($200 Million, including $21m for sod).

BAD RESULTS

  • No Jobs: While they have not been able to support these claims, Pelosi/Obama promise between 3 & 4 million jobs, yet House Tax Committee staff can’t estimate even ONE job will be created.
  • Ineffective: The Congressional Budget Office estimates that only 52% of the spending in the ‘stimulus bill’ can even be spent by the end of FY’10.  Well short of the 75% benchmark set by President Obama.

“We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work.” – FDR’s Treasury Sec. Henry Morgenthau Jr., architect of the New Deal.

BETTER IDEAS AND RESULTS

  1. Make the 2001 and 2003 Tax Cuts permanent, instead of raising taxes in 2011; Reduce Marginal Tax Rates for  Individuals and Businesses by 10% creating new jobs. Adopting just this one proposal would create between 500,000 and 1 million jobs in one year.
  2. Repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax & reduce the Death Tax to 15% ($5 mil. individual exclusion) Enact long-term reforms and budgets for entitlement spending., putting long-term obligations from Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, front and center in the budget process.
  3. Assess and enforce long term spending rules in Congress. Get us out of debt!
  4. Go to Heritage.org for more ideas and ways to avoid giving Americans a debt they didn’t create.
 
Thank you to the Heritage Foundation for the above material.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A New Declaration of Independence?

Now that some of the fanfare surrounding the corronation, uh...excuse me, inauguration of Barack Obama has calmed down, there are a few lines from the address that should be examined, especially from a historical point of view.
 
While there are many lines in the address I found alarming, none were more so than his decree for this nation to proclaim ".....a new Declaration of Independence....". This line, framed in his usual fluffy yet soaring rhetoric, seems to call America to rally to a new beginning. A beginning which echoes the Founding Father's vision of America going so far as to say, "Our Founding Fathers ... drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man ... and we will not give them up for expedience's sake."  But when we compare the Founder's vision to Obama's, we see the stark contrasts in their visions for American government. The Declaration of Independence was just that...a declaration of independence from an oppressive government who had, in the Founder's eyes, long over stepped their authority in dealing with the American colonies. This led our founding generation to risk life and fortune to shake off the chains of oppression from thier existing government and start anew. But just what does Barack Obama envision as our "new Declartion of Independence"? The largest expansion of government into the lives of its citizens in generations. The Founder's felt the best government was the one that governs the least. Now compare that to what is currently being presented in Washington with the blessing of President Obama and the democratically controlled Congress. What it comes down to is an alterring of this nation and its founding principles to the point of faint recognition. The role of government under Obama and the democrats will share NOTHING with the Founding Father's vision for this nation. If you feel our government has already exceeded its Constitutional authority, you ain't seen nothing yet.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Have Social Conservatives Ruined the Republican Party?

I have had a lot of discussions with friends of mine who believe social conservatives have ruined the republican party. To be honest, I feel the argument holds no water and wonder just what kind of society they would envision us having if moral absolutes are torn down? To me, they have become moral relativists and this is very dangerous. If we cannot agree on what is right and wrong, good and evil, then we are truly done as a society. In our politically correct world, judgements on anything from personal character to personal choices are routinely viewed as unenlightened and oppressive. This is where the trap springs closed on all who have foolishly stumbled into the mind of liberalism. Making moral judgements is essential to how ones life turns out. When a society no longer has the moral conviction to declare something wrong socially, we open ourselves up to just about anything being acceptable. I don't care if you still hold conservative political views but feel government has no business getting involved in such issues, this is still dangerous.

Our morals as a society dictate what kind of government we will have to endure. Think about it......our government today is a mirror reflection of the nation's character today. The two are inseperable! This is my argument to all those who are conservative but turn from the "blue blood social conservatism" (as I have heard it referred to) that I feel is essential to self government. If we are a morallly bankrupt people, then our government will also reflect that notion. And what's more, the Founders felt that way too.

I open this to discussion but feel compelled to include the following:

"Statesmen my dear Sir, may plan and speculate for Liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone, which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand....The only foundation of a free Constitution, is pure Virtue, and if this cannot be inspired into our People, in a great Measure, than they have it now, They may change their Rulers, and the forms of Government, but they will not obtain a lasting Liberty." - John Adams 1776

"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams 1798

"Religion and good morals are the only solid foundation of public liberty and happiness." - Samuel Adams

"Reading, reflection and time have convinced me that the interests of society require the observation of those moral precepts...in which all religions agree." - Thomas Jefferson

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism who should labor to subvert these great Pillars of human happiness." - George Washington

"[W]here is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation deserts the oaths...?" - George Washington

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberals Ignore and Re-Write History

In the latest attempt by liberals to shake the country from its Christian moorings, the left has put their finishing touches on the new Capitol Visitor Center in Washington D.C.. The new $621 million (9 times over budget) visitor center is suppose to be an ode to democracy and America's experiment in self-government by "educating" the public about the nation's founding doucuments and principles. But what the PC left has given the American public has been described as "scandoulous" and in one visitors words, Heritage Foundation constitutional expert Matthew Spaulding, a "living temple to the liberal's view of a living Constitution".
 
Apparently its not so much what the new visitor center says as much as what it doesn't. There is no mention of the Founding Fathers faith in God and that many of them felt "divine providence" was the reason why the American experiment even began. There is no mention of the founder's belief that our rights come from God and not kings and governement institutions. But in what has to be the funniest and also saddest revelation from the Exhibition Hall was the attempt to actually change our nation's motto to "E Pluribus Unum- Out of Many, One" from "In God We Trust". Apparently the designers believed "E Pluribus Unum" was the nation's motto and had the words carved into marble to adorn the Hall. Imagine their embarrassment when they were alerted to our country's actual motto "In God We Trust" and they had to plaster over the their mistake. As for the actual motto, well, apparently they didn't like that one and elected to ignore "In God We Trust" completely omitting it from the Hall. They also omitted from the 1787 Northwest Ordinance exhibit the opening line from the document that signalled this nation's westward expansion, "Religion, morality and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind ...", yet continued on to describe its significance in our nation's history.
 
The new visitor center also had some startling ideas about our Constitution. They actually referred to the legislative powers delagated by the Constitution as "aspirations", not the clearly defined and limited role the legislature should assume. I couldn't believe it, not powers but "aspirations". What a joke! Isn't this nothing more than liberals trying to find Constitutional authority for the courts advance into legislative territory? If this is the history we are passing on to a nation, then God help us. This revised, flawed, and terrible interpretation is the liberal's view of the Constitution as a "living document" and opens the door for complete government control over every facet of our lives. And what's worse is liberals will argue the Constitution gives them the power to do such things.
 
I can personally attest to the liberal version of our founding as I was in Washington D.C. in mid-November and had the privelege of viewing our founding documents, the original Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, at the National Archives. As I was waiting my turn to view the documents, I began reading the "educational" plaque that described what it was we were about to see and what they essentially meant to our Founding Fathers and how they still apply today. Within the first four sentences, they did a wonderful job explaining that our Founding Fathers believed our rights did not come from kings, governments, or civil institutions, as was the norm up until that time. But what shocked me was the way in which they skated right over the most important part of the founding document's philosophy, where the Founding Fathers did believe our rights came from.....GOD. I found it dishearteneing and dishonest to tell all who stood and marvelled at those documents where our rights did not come from, but unwilling to tell us what the Founder's did believe, that our rights come from God. In fact, one of the documents we were about to view said as much. But hey, why let fact, truth, and history ruin one's ideological view?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hiatus Over!!

After roughly a 3 month break from my blog, I have returned to share with you my ideas and visions for where this nation is headed. I look forward to an engaging discussion with you concerning various issues and encourage you to check back regularily. At no other time in my life has our exchange and discussion of ideas been more crucial. Happy New Year to one and all and God Bless!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Great Video Using Democrats Own Words On Crisis

Here is another must see video concerning the financial situation we are currently enduring. This is yet one more piece of evidence showing who really is responsible for the mess we are in financially.
                                                          
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Must See Video...Fannie CEO and Obama

I was sent this video in an email and and it seems to go hand in hand with the SNL video from the previous post. The democrats, including and especially Barack Obama, are clearly responsible for this financial crisis and its time the American people learn what the mainstream media won't tell them.
                                                   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Presidential Character

"The public cannot be too curious concerning the characters of public men." —Samuel Adams

In his Inaugural Address on 20 January, 1961, President John F. Kennedy closed his remarks with these famous words: "And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country."

With those words, JFK, considered by many to be the most exemplary leader of the Democrat Party in the 20th Century, asked Americans to put country first, a bedrock principle of the Party until the last few decades.

However today, the current slate of Democrats have turned Jack Kennedy's national challenge on end, essentially proclaiming, "ask what your country can do for you, not what you can do for your country."

In 1963, Martin Luther King stood on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and said for all to hear, "I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

Has his dream been realized, or have Democrat leaders divided us up into constituency groups, where we are judged by all manner of ethnicity and special interests rather than the individual and national character King envisioned?

Kennedy and King had it right, but the Democrat Party has squandered their great legacy, and betrayed us, moreover enslaving many Americans as dependant wards of the state.

This is not the Democrat Party envisioned by Franklin Delano Roosevelt or Harry Truman, much less its founder, Thomas Jefferson, who would not recognize even the most vestigial elements of his once-noble Party. (This dramatic transition is evident in the Democrat Party Platforms from Kennedy to Obama.)

When asked why he left the Democrat Party, perhaps the most famous of former Democrats said, "I did not leave the Democratic Party, the Democratic Party left me." That was Ronald Reagan, who earned the respect and support of an enormous number of Democrats during his presidency. His observation, "the Party left me," has never been more true than today.

For several months, we have heard and observed two presidential candidates, centrist Republican John McCain and liberal Democrat Barack Obama. It should by now, be obvious to all of us who put our country first, which of these candidates possess the high qualities of a statesman, and the prerequisite moral and civic virtues for an American president.

Unfortunately, too many of my fellow Americans have difficulty distinguishing these qualities.

Every four years, at the peak of presidential election cycles, we're told by the talkingheads and the party hacks that "this election is the most important in our lifetimes." This time, however, they may be right. These are indeed perilous times.

Our nation is facing crises on several critical fronts, including an historic economic disaster, the resolution of which will require the steady hand of a statesman in possession of outstanding character — character that has been honed over his lifetime, character that is proven consistent with our nation's legacy of liberty and equality.

That reformed Democrat, Ronald Reagan, wrote, "The character that takes command in moments of crucial choices has already been determined by a thousand other choices made earlier in seemingly unimportant moments. It has been determined by all the 'little' choices of years past — by all those times when the voice of conscience was at war with the voice of temptation, [which was] whispering the lie that 'it really doesn't matter.' It has been determined by all the day-to-day decisions made when life seemed easy and crises seemed far away — the decision that, piece by piece, bit by bit, developed habits of discipline or of laziness; habits of self-sacrifice or self-indulgence; habits of duty and honor and integrity — or dishonor and shame."

For the first and final word on the necessary character traits the next president should possess, let's return to our foundation, our Founders, those who risked all to proclaim our individual rights and responsibilities as ordained by God, and outlined them in our Declaration of Independence and its subordinate exposition, our Republic's Constitution.

Our Founders wrote at length about character, both of those who seek high office (or, rather, those that high office seeks), and those who elect them. Here are but a few excerpts in their own words.

John Adams: "Children should be educated and instructed in the principles of freedom. ... If we suffer [the minds of young people] to grovel and creep in infancy, they will grovel all their lives. ... We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. ... We should be unfaithful to ourselves if we should ever lose sight of the danger to our liberties if anything partial or extraneous should infect the purity of our free, fair, virtuous, and independent elections."

Samuel Adams: "Nothing is more essential to the establishment of manners in a State than that all persons employed in places of power and trust must be men of unexceptionable characters. ... If men of wisdom and knowledge, of moderation and temperance, of patience, fortitude and perseverance, of sobriety and true republican simplicity of manners, of zeal for the honour of the Supreme Being and the welfare of the commonwealth; if men possessed of these other excellent qualities are chosen to fill the seats of government, we may expect that our affairs will rest on a solid and permanent foundation. ... [N]either the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. ... No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders. ... Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote that he is not making a present or a compliment to please an individual — or at least that he ought not so to do; but that he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and his country. ... Religion and good morals are the only solid foundation of public liberty and happiness."

Thomas Jefferson: "It is the manners and spirit of a people which preserve a republic in vigor. A degeneracy in these is a canker which soon eats to the heart of its laws and constitution. ... If a nation expects to be ignorant — and free — in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be. ... The whole art of government consists in the art of being honest. Only aim to do your duty, and mankind will give you credit where you fail. ... An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens."

George Washington: "No compact among men ... can be pronounced everlasting and inviolable, and if I may so express myself, that no Wall of words, that no mound of parchment can be so formed as to stand against the sweeping torrent of boundless ambition on the one side, aided by the sapping current of corrupted morals on the other. ...[A] good moral character is the first essential in a man, and that the habits contracted [early in life] are generally indelible, and your conduct here may stamp your character through life. It is therefore highly important that you should endeavor not only to be learned but virtuous. ... The foundations of our national policy will be laid in the pure and immutable principles of private morality, and the preeminence of free government be exemplified by all the attributes which can win the affections of its citizens, and command the respect of the world. ...[W]here is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation deserts the oaths...? Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism who should labor to subvert these great Pillars of human happiness — these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens."

At the end of the Revolution, when our Founders were endeavoring "to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity," Founding brothers Alexander Hamilton and John Jay and our Constitution's author, James Madison, wrote The Federalist Papers, its most authentic and comprehensive explication.

In Federalist No. 1, Hamilton warned, "Of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people, commencing demagogues and ending tyrants."

Sound familiar?

In No. 10, Madison cautions, "Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm," and insisted in No. 57, "The aim of every political Constitution is or ought to be first to obtain for rulers, men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous, whilst they continue to hold their public trust."

Madison's Supreme Court nominee, Justice Joseph Story, wrote, "Republics are created by the virtue, public spirit, and intelligence of the citizens. They fall, when the wise are banished from the public councils, because they dare to be honest, and the profligate are rewarded, because they flatter the people, in order to betray them."

The Founders thus warned of the perils posed by the candidate who lacks political courage; the candidate who tells us everything we want to hear.

In November 1800, John Adams, in his fourth year as president, wrote to his wife Abigail, "I Pray Heaven to bestow the best of blessing on this house, and on ALL that shall hereafter inhabit it. May none but honest and wise men ever rule under this roof!"

We should all pray likewise, now, today, this minute.

As Adams understood, "A Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever."

Almost two centuries later, Ronald Reagan reiterated, "Freedom is ... never more than one generation away from extinction. Every generation has to learn how to protect and defend it, or it's gone and gone for a long, long time."

So, what of the current generation of voters, and the two presidential candidates?

On 4 November, one of these candidates will receive a majority of electoral votes, and in January, be seated as our next president. But for sure, this election is much more than a referendum on the two candidates; it is a referendum on the ability of Americans to discern between one candidate who possesses the character and integrity of a statesman, which the office of president requires, and one who does not.

At this pivotal moment in our nation's history, let's hope that a majority of us have sufficient courage and character to make that distinction, and vote on what we know rather than how we feel.

Let's put country first.

For more information on the character of the presidential candidates, link to The McCain record and The Obama record.

Please forward these insights to your family, friends and associates.
                                                               -  Courtesy of The Patriot Post
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345Next »