About Me

Name: Boomer911
Location: Chicago, IL
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Great Information!!
  • The Patriot Post">Patriot Post

A Real Conservative

I don't think its any secret to those who follow politics that the United States government is out of control. The Democrats (socialists) feel there isn't one problem the country faces that can't be solved with huge tax increases and expanding the size of the federal government. The problem is too many Republicans have fallen into line with this sort of thinking as well. The Founding Father's vision of "limited government" was thrown out the window decades ago and the march to socialism continues on at the peril of our liberties and our fortunes. There is coming a time in the not too distant future when we are going to have to STOP the path we are on or face a very grim reality that the United States is dying a slow death brought about by the very ones we the people elected to save us. Unfortunately, an uninformed and apathetic electorate don't seem to notice the dilemma and continue to throw gasoline on the fire.
 
It is important to acknowledge those out there on the front lines of politics who are really standing up for the people of this nation by spreading their accomplishments, and this is the exact reason for this post. Senator Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) is one of those true conservative heroes, standing up to government interference, regulation, and expansion. Over the past year, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) has placed “holds” on dozens of bills that Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) had slated for expedited passage through the Senate. With the legislative session drawing to a close, Reid has now bundled all of these bills into one massive package that he plans to cram through the Senate with one single vote. Learning of Reid’s plan, Coburn spoke from the Senate floor:
 

That bill is coming about because myself and several other senators have refused to allow those bills to go without debate on this floor and without the ability to amend them. Now, some of them are very good things we ought to be about. But we should not be about it until we are going to inculcate and act as senators the same way every other family in this country has to act; that is, by making a decision based on priorities. …

By historical standards, this is supposed to be the greatest deliberative body in the world. In the 110th Congress, 890 bills have passed — 890. Fifty of them have had debate. Only 50 have had debate. And for most of those, the debate has been extremely limited and shortened through the power of the majority leader. …

So is it any wonder that only 9% of the American public has any significant confidence in the Congress to put forward their interests? We are going to be doing this at a time when the No. 1 issue in this country is energy security and energy prices, but we are going to put a bill on the Senate floor that grows the government, that creates 70 new programs, and spends somewhere between $25 billion and $50 billion.

I would tell my colleagues that most people sitting down to their dinner table think we have our priorities messed up, and they are right. We do.
Earlier in his speech, Coburn noted that according to the Government Accountability Office, federal spending is already around 20% of GDP. If we do nothing to change current policy, it is set to rise to 35% of GDP by 2038. That number is a huge threat to the liberty of America. It is high time the Senate started an honest debate about it.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama'a Tax Increase The Highest Ever

The Democrat's (socialists) notion that "all things European would be just fine for America", would no doubt continue and expand under a president Obama. It doesn't matter how unsuccessful a policy it might be, if the Europeans are doing it, we must do it. Democrats are all smiles about saddling the American taxpayers with more taxes in order to pay for "universal health care", a system that has been shown to be a complete failure wherever it has been implemented but hey, why let other's failures be your guide? The same thing holds true for Obama's plan to put us at European levels of taxation and give the nation the largest tax increase in our history. Obama and his socialist cronies believe the best way to help the economy is to tax productivity. They still don't understand the way a free market should work as indicated by their continued government regulation policies and interference. The poor do not create jobs nor maintain much productivity in the work force as many opt for public aid and welfare systems with the incentive to leave such programs no longer relevant. The Democrats hammering those who create jobs and wealth for others will only hurt the ones they have tried to help, the poor. They contend the best way to help people is from the bottom - up instead of top - down which is not only economically wrong but economically dangerous for the rest of us. Lets look at what Obama is promising as far as taxes are concerned.
 
Obama has stated many times he will let the Bush tax cuts expire. This will allow the top two tax rates to return to 36 and 39.6 percent. His plan would boost the top marginal rate to well over 55 percent—before the inclusion of state and local taxes—resulting in many individuals seeing their marginal tax rate double. The Heritage Foundation explains it this way, "Senator Obama's new tax rate would give the United States one of the highest tax rates among developed countries. Currently only six of the top 30 industrial nations have a tax rate for all levels of government combined of over 55 percent. Under this tax plan, the United States would join this group and have a higher top rate than such high-tax nations as Sweden and Denmark. The top marginal rate would exceed 60 percent with the inclusion of state and local taxes, which means that only Hungary would exceed Senator Obama's new proposed top tax."  But what is truly frightening is that of the six countries with higher tax rates than 55 percent, the average unemployment rate is 7.35 percent. Plus his tax plan adds to the national debt and will leave us even more unprepared to handle America's rising cost of entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare. Here are some quick numbers showing the impact of the tax cuts and the repercussions of them expiring:
           
$2.4 Trillion- The overall tax increase faced by American families, seniors, and businesses if the Bush tax cuts expire.
 
$1,716- The average tax increase for over 100 million Americans if tax cuts are allowed to expire.
 
$2,034- The average tax increase that will hit 17 million seniors if the Bush tax cuts expire.
 
8.3 Million- The number of jobs created since the tax cuts of 2003.
 
$91 Billion- The cost of reinstating the death tax.
 
44 million- The number of married couples affected if the Marriage Penalty is reinstated.
 
$1,480- The average cost in 2000 for cuples punished by the Marriage Penalty
 
$108 Billion- The reduction in the federal deficit in 2005 thanks to the economic growth sparked by the tax cuts.
 
 
 
No doubt Obama's plan will slow the economy to a crawl and definitely send us into a recession. The question is can we get this news to the masses before the election in November? I think we can. We just need to keep on the offensive.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More Political Musings......

1)  While I think most of us conservatives differ tremendously with our socialist (democrats) counterparts, it is important to pass on great quotes or statements concerning the liberals ability to not be able to see the forest for the trees. We begin with a great quote from The Heritage Foundation's economist J.D. Foster, when he says this about the democrats:
 
      “They propose higher tobacco taxes to discourage smoking. They propose higher taxes on liquor to discourage drinking. They propose vastly higher taxes through cap-and-trade contraptions to reduce carbon emissions. So what do they expect will happen when they raise income tax rates?”
 
Having said all of that, The Patriot Post covers the news concerning our democratically controlled houses of Congress with this:
 
         "Democrats in the House and Senate passed the $3.1-trillion 2009 budget plan this week, a nonbinding resolution, as they patted themselves on the back for their fiscal responsibility. Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-ND) boasted that the budget plan would “strengthen the economy and create jobs. It will provide tax cuts for the middle class, and it will restore fiscal responsibility by balancing the books by 2012 and maintaining balance in 2013.” The fine print reveals the secret to this promise. The plan assumes that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will cost nothing after next year. It also anticipates that the Bush tax cuts will expire by 2011. In other words, Democrats are about to hit Americans with the largest tax hike in history. And that doesn’t include the Alternative Minimum Tax, which Democrats continue to ignore as it prepares to hit more than 20 million middle-class families."
 
2)   I feel it important once again to draw attention to the fact we are destroying Al Qaeda around the world. But in spite of the many accomplishments of our wonderful men and women in our Armed Forces, Nancy Pelosi had the unbelievable gall to utter the following:
 
      “Whatever the military success, and progress that may have been made, the surge didn’t accomplish its goal, and some of the success of the surge is the good will of the Iranians—they decided in Basra when the fighting would end, they negotiated that cessation of hostilities—the Iranians.” —House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
 
 
3)    In another show of weakness and appeasement, Great Britain refused to stand up for its culture and Christian heritage by telling two Christian evangelicals to stop handing out leaflets in a Muslim neighborhood or face the threat of being beat up. Now here is where the story gets confusing because British authorities seem to be saying they are not willing to get involved should the Christians get attacked by Muslims. In fact, it almost sounds as if they are saying they would deserve the attack. Am I wrong or is this appeasement?
 
 

 

 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »